Its been awhile since my first post, but I felt the need to at least write down my thoughts even if nobody cares to read them. Healthcare has been successfully passed now in the House and the Senate and the president will sign the bill very soon.
My view is that this whole debate has been skewed toward the idea that government must do anything to "fix" something that has been working quite well for a long time. In fact it is my view that the things that hold back our current health care system are in areas where government has failed to live up to its obligations. For instance, buying health insurance accross state lines is impossible right now, but if that restriction were lifted, it is my opinion that this would increase competition and the "invisible hand" of Adam Smith would be allowed to do its work and drive down premiums. The commerce clause in the U.S. constitution states that Congress shall have the power, "To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes". Now the term "regulate" means to "make regular" commerce with nations, states and tribes. It doesn't however, mean that they can or should straddle citizens and businesses with restrictive and burdensome legislation. This is exactly what this new health care bill accomplishes.
For the first time in American history to be a citizen of the United States of America in good standing you will be required to purchase something. This is an iggregious violation of human natural rights and any liberty loving American should work to change this law by voting for candidates and joining organizations whose loyalties lie with the U.S. Constitution and who work for the proliferation of liberty.
"Freedom, in a political context, means freedom from government coercion. It does not mean freedom from the landlord, or freedom from the employer, or freedom from the laws of nature which do not provide men with automatic prosperity. It means freedom from the coercive power of the state--and nothing else."
-Ayn Rand-
Health care is not a right. A right cannot be material or financial in nature. A right is something that exists in the natural world in the absence of the state or any form of government. Health care obviously does not fall under this category and its absurd on its face to assert that it should. Anything that requires another individual to provide for the person receiving the benefit cannot be a right. That is the looting of one class of society to benefit another class and its wrong. We are heading down a path and there is a cliff at the end, we need to turn back now!
Another post is coming soon on the Federal Reserve, but for now I leave you with this quote:
“If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquillity of servitude than the animating contest of freedom, — go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen!”
-Samuel Adams-
As always I love to hear you thoughts and look forward to discussing this further.
Regards,
Joshua McKee
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
It's pretty scary when Mexico has more Freedom than we do.
ReplyDeleteThe joke is on the masses that flock to such a concept. I am not sure how many that might be but they will find out healthcare is even less free when the government runs the program. For starters Value added taxes VAT are just around the corner and they will hit all who consume. What shocks me most is how so many well meaning Christian people have suckered up to this charade. Just as in Germany they will pay the price for not being "innocent as a dove and wise as a serpant". "If my people will humble themselves and ...."
ReplyDeleteHere is a mandate.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.constitution.org/mil/mil_act_1792.htm